Tag: Gold-for-Reserves

  • Monetary Policy vs. Precious Metals: Why Gold is Trapped in a 2026 Bear Market

    Monetary Policy vs. Precious Metals: Why Gold is Trapped in a 2026 Bear Market

    By Adnan Adams Mohammed;

    Financial and Economic Journalist

    In a startling reversal of fortune, gold the “perpetual safe haven” has entered a decisive bear market in March 2026. After hitting a historic peak of US$5,589 per ounce in late January, the metal plummeted nearly 19%, trading as low as US$4,551 last week.

    While geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and threats to the Strait of Hormuz typically send gold prices climbing, a new economic reality has taken hold. In 2026, the traditional “flight to safety” is being rerouted by the sheer gravity of global monetary policy.

    The hawkish “hold”: why the Fed broke the rally

    The primary catalyst for the current slump is a radical shift in expectations from the U.S. Federal Reserve. On March 18, the Fed held interest rates steady at 3.5%–3.75%, but it was the “dot plot” that rattled investors.

    Plagued by sticky inflation fueled by rising energy costs, the Fed signaled it would likely authorize only one rate cut for the entirety of 2026.

    The Opportunity Cost: Because gold pays no interest, it struggles to compete when government bonds offer high, guaranteed yields.

    The Dollar Factor: The hawkish stance pushed the U.S. Dollar Index toward the 100.0 mark, making gold which is priced in dollars prohibitively expensive for international buyers.

    The inflation paradox of 2026

    In a typical cycle, high inflation (driven currently by an oil spike above US$100 per barrel) would be gold’s best friend. However, in the current landscape, markets view high inflation as a “green light” for central banks to keep rates high.

    “Gold is being sold during an active conflict because the oil shock from that conflict is forcing central banks to stay hawkish,” noted a research strategist at Pepperstone. “Higher oil means higher inflation, which means gold suffers despite the geopolitical backdrop.”

    Institutional “paper” flushes

    The bear market is being accelerated by the “paper market” futures contracts and gold-backed ETFs. As prices began to slip in February, many leveraged institutional investors faced margin calls.

    Liquidity Squeeze: Large funds have been selling their gold positions not because they lack faith in the metal, but because gold is highly liquid. They are “selling what they can” to raise cash and cover losses in other volatile sectors like silver and tech.

    Retail Retreat: After a 70% surge in 2025, many retail investors are booking profits, further increasing the “global glut” of available bullion.

    Ghana’s strategic pivot

    For Ghana, the world’s leading gold producer per capita, this “bear trap” is more than a market headline, it’s a budgetary crisis. With export revenues directly tied to the spot price, the Ministry of Finance is reportedly reviewing its 2026 revenue targets.

    However, the Bank of Ghana remains a steady hand. While private investors flee, the central bank continues its “Gold-for-Reserve” program and remains part of a broader trend of “de-dollarization,” where sovereign states accumulate physical gold as a long-term hedge against the very systemic risks currently causing the price dip.

    As gold is currently caught in a tug-of-war between geopolitical fear (which wants prices higher) and monetary math (which is pulling prices lower), for now, the math is winning.

    Analysts suggest that until the Federal Reserve moves from a “hawkish hold” to a true “easing cycle,” the gilded king will remain trapped in its 2026 retreat.

     

     

     

  • Goldbod pauses regulatory arm to fast-track economic gains

    Goldbod pauses regulatory arm to fast-track economic gains

    In a strategic pivot aimed at streamlining Ghana’s gold sector, the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) has announced the immediate suspension of its regulatory and enforcement functions.

    The move, which took effect today, February 16, 2026, signals a shift toward a purely commercial mandate as the institution seeks to cement its role as the nation’s premier gold trading entity.

    The suspension of these “police-like” powerswhich previously included licensing market participants and conducting nationwide crackdowns marks a critical phase in the 2026 Gold Reform Roadmap. The decision follows months of pressure from international fiscal monitors and local governance experts to separate the Board’s “judge and player” roles.

    A “Judge and Player” Conflict Resolved

    Since its establishment under Act 1140, GoldBod has held a dual mandate: acting as the sole legal off-taker for artisanal gold while also serving as the sector’s primary regulator. This arrangement, while effective for a quick formalization of the industry in 2025, raised concerns regarding conflicts of interest.

    “To reach our goal of exporting three metric tonnes of gold weekly, we must be a world-class trader first,” said Sammy Gyamfi, Esq., CEO of GoldBod. “Separating the regulatory burden allows us to focus on aggregation, value addition, and our ‘Gold-for-Reserve’ (G4R) program without being slowed down by administrative policing.”

    The New Interim Framework

    Under the measures effective today, the following changes will be implemented to ensure the gold market remains stable:

    ● Regulatory Transfer: Licensing and sector monitoring will temporarily revert to the Minerals Commission and the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources.

    ● Enforcement Pause: The “Task Force” operations targeting unlicensed jewelry manufacturers and gold refineries—originally scheduled for a February rollout—have been suspended.

    ● Commercial Priority: GoldBod will focus its resources on its District Gold Buying Centres and its landmark refining deal to process one metric tonne of gold locally per week.

    The timing of the suspension is no coincidence. It aligns with the IMF’s 2026 structural review, which called for clearer accounting in the Bank of Ghana’s books regarding gold-backed forex inflows. By stripping GoldBod of its regulatory functions, the government is creating a more transparent, “arms-length” relationship between the state and the gold trade.

    Function Old Model (Jan 2026) New Interim Model (Feb 2026+)

    Buying Gold GoldBod GoldBod (Exclusive)

    Issuing Licenses GoldBod Minerals Commission

    Market Policing GoldBod Task Force Joint Ministry Task Force

    Export Rights GoldBod GoldBod (Exclusive)

    Looking Ahead: The Blockchain Future

    While the regulatory arm is currently “on ice,” GoldBod is not retreating from its mission to sanitize the sector. The Board is still on track to launch its Blockchain Track and Trace system by the end of 2026. This digital solution will eventually replace manual enforcement with high-tech transparency, allowing every gram of gold to be traced from its sustainable mine of origin to the international market.

    For the ordinary miner and licensed jeweler, the message is clear: the buying windows remain open, but the rules of the game are being refined for a more professional, global stage.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Stakeholders clash amid call for review of Gold For Reserves policy

    Stakeholders clash amid call for review of Gold For Reserves policy

    By Adnan Adams Mohammed

    The immediate past Finance Minister, Dr. Mohammed Amin Adam, has questioned the sincerity of the Bank of Ghana’s data provided to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), particularly regarding a reported GH¢3.8 billion loss in 2024 under the Gold for Reserves programme.

    Dr. Adam highlighted the absence of documentation for this loss at a parliamentary hearing and its non-inclusion in the bank’s published financial statements or reports to the IMF, raising concerns about potential misreporting.

    As tensions rise, Bank of Ghana Governor, Dr. Johnson Asiama, has called for a review of the programme, urging the Finance Ministry to consider alternative financing structures to ease the central bank’s financial burden. The programme’s sustainability hangs in the balance as stakeholders demand accountability and transparency.

    The IMF has insisted it stands by its assessment of a US$214 million loss through the Bank of Ghana’s Gold for Reserves programme by September 2025, clarifying that its report aimed to highlight operational and financial risks rather than classify the program as loss-making.

    The Bank of Ghana however, describes the IMF’s assessment as speculative, since it is citing unaudited figures.

    The IMF’s Country Representative for Ghana, Dr Adrian Alter, disclosed this during a conversation on PM Express Business Edition, last week.

    Dr Alter explained that the assessment contained in the staff report was not intended to classify the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme as a loss-making operation, but rather to highlight the operational and financial risks, particularly in relation to Goldbod dealings.

    The country representative noted that “we understand that the numbers are still being audited as we speak, and there is the likelihood that numbers could go down marginally or go up.”

    Dr Alter acknowledged that the Bank of Ghana had described the IMF’s assessment as speculative because audited figures are still being prepared.

    He stressed that the Fund stands by its assessment, which was meant to highlight expected challenges and not to cast doubt on the programme.

    Apparently, the Bank of Ghana, in a statement issued on December 25, 2025, maintained that figures reported in relation to losses from gold operations in 2025 should be described as speculative.

    The Bank argued that since its audited financial statements for its 2025 performance, including all relevant disclosures, will be published in 2026 in accordance with statutory requirements, it would not be right to give credence to these reports.

    The Bank of Ghana further noted that although the IMF review flagged financial risks associated with the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme, these concerns should be viewed within the broader context of the programme’s significant macroeconomic contribution.

    It stated that the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme has helped to boost Ghana’s international reserves, support currency stability, and enable access to large volumes of foreign exchange without incurring new debt.

    “The operational role of GOLDBOD as an aggregator has been important in channelling gold-based inflows from the small-scale mining sector into the official market,” the document from the Bank of Ghana stated.

    Consequently, Dr Asiama, has called for a review of the Gold-for-Reserves programme, urging the Minister for Finance, Dr Cassiel Ato Forson, to consider a more sustainable financing structure for the Ghana Gold Board’s (GoldBod) trading operations.

    He said such a rethink is necessary to ease the financial burden currently borne by the central bank.

    Dr Asiama made the appeal while responding to questions at a sitting of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee, where concerns were raised about losses incurred by the Bank of Ghana in supporting GoldBod’s gold purchasing activities.

    He explained that the programme plays a key role in building Ghana’s foreign reserves and therefore requires stronger backing from the Ministry of Finance.

    “It’s not a question of shutting it down, but enhancing its efficiency by looking at the inefficiencies and taking them out,” he said.

    According to the BoG Governor, a critical issue is whether the costs associated with the programme should continue to be absorbed by the central bank.

    “The best thing now, in the national interest, is to look again at the trading model and decide whether the Ministry of Finance should make a budgetary allocation to take care of the costs, given that this is supporting our reserves build-up,” Dr Asiama stated.

    He added that these are policy questions that require consensus at the national level.

    Dr Asiama noted that the Bank of Ghana has already taken steps to address some inefficiencies within the programme and stressed the need for a coordinated approach to ensure its long-term success.

    “In the case of the Gold-for-Reserves, as the name suggests, the objective was to help us build reserves, and the evidence is clear,” he said, pointing to improvements made so far.

    “Going forward, let’s look at the aspects we can fix in the interest of the country. It calls for a unified approach.”

    The BoG has come under intense scrutiny following revelations by the International Monetary Fund in its fifth review of Ghana’s ongoing IMF programme that losses from artisanal and small-scale gold transactions under the scheme had reached US$214 million by the end of September 2025.

    While GoldBod itself has reportedly recorded profits, the IMF noted that the central bank absorbed most of the losses arising from the programme.